In the 1980s, Canadian broadcaster Global Television Network found an unexpected opportunity buried in broadcasting regulations.

Overnight programming was typically filled with test patterns that generated no revenue. Instead of accepting that loss, Global rethought how those hours could be used. A cameraman was sent out into the streets of Toronto to capture the city after dark in a simple, unscripted way.

To avoid licensing costs, producers created original music to accompany the footage. The result was a low cost, atmospheric program produced entirely in house.

Because the show qualified as fully Canadian content, it helped the network meet regulatory requirements while keeping valuable primetime slots open for more profitable American programming.

The program was called Night Walk.

What began as a workaround ended up creating something far more lasting. The footage now stands as a time capsule, offering a quiet, unfiltered look at a different era.

The lesson is straightforward. Constraints are not always barriers. Sometimes they are the starting point for smarter, more creative solutions. What is your Night Walk moment?

If you’re a decision maker at your company, you need to be on the bleeding edge of, well, everything. But before you go signing up for seminars, conferences, lunch ‘n learns, and all that jazz, just know there’s a far better (and simpler) way: Subscribing to The Deep View.

This daily newsletter condenses everything you need to know about the latest and greatest AI developments into a 5-minute read. Squeeze it into your morning coffee break and before you know it, you’ll be an expert too.

Subscribe right here. It’s totally free, wildly informative, and trusted by 600,000+ readers at Google, Meta, Microsoft, and beyond.

Here's something I know for certain: as your wealth grows, the relationship between spending and common sense completely breaks down.

Let me explain what I mean.

When you get rich, the relative value of money fades. But the value of instant gratification pleasure, a status signal, collecting a moment goes up 10x, 100x. And here's the kicker: spending freely also validates your wealth. It signals how smart you were to earn it, how your time is simply worth more than the task at hand.

This creates a paradox that every entrepreneur should understand and build around. Below is the math that proves it and the business opportunity hiding inside it.

Once someone’s after tax hourly rate clears $300, outsourcing almost anything becomes mathematically rational. The question isn’t “can I afford it?” it’s “why would I ever do it myself?”

That’s the business you want to be in.

You are not selling a service. You are selling the permission to stop thinking about something. That is what wealthy people are actually buying. The more frictionless, invisible, and “handled” your offering feels, the more premium you can price it and the more loyal your client becomes.

The richest clients don’t ask “is this worth the money?” They ask “why didn’t I find this sooner?”

One author ran Louis Vuitton. The other holds the Pernod Ricard Chair on Prestige and Luxury Management at HEC Paris, Europe's top business school. Together they wrote the book that Chanel, Hermes, Ferrari, and Cartier executives actually keep on their desks. Outside the boardrooms of LVMH and Kering, almost nobody in the entrepreneurship world has ever heard of it. The Luxury Strategy: Break the Rules of Marketing to Build Luxury Brands 2nd Edition

Kapferer spent decades studying why some brands can charge 10x what a technically equivalent competitor charges, and why lowering the price of those brands actually destroys demand. His conclusion challenged everything mainstream marketing teaches:

The Anti-Law of Luxury: "The more people who can access your brand, the less desirable it becomes. Luxury is not about selling more. It is about selling to fewer people, at a higher price, in a way that increases desire among those who cannot yet afford it."

This is the intellectual foundation for a complete inversion of the standard growth playbook. Every conversion optimization framework, every "reduce friction" UX principle, every "lower the barrier to entry" strategy Kapferer argues they are exactly wrong for premium tier businesses. Hermes has a two year waiting list for a Birkin bag it could manufacture faster. Apple killed its cheapest Mac line when it needed to feel more premium again. The Met Gala charges $75,000 per ticket and turns away billionaires.

The paradox Kapferer articulates, and that this audience should absorb, is this: if you are building a service for wealthy clients, making it harder to access, not easier, is often the correct business decision. Scarcity is not a supply chain problem. It is a pricing strategy.

Just like the earlier section asked who to sell premium services to, this book answers how to make them want it more.

Alan Weiss built a solo consulting practice that generated over $1 million annually with no partners, no staff, and no clients who haggled on price. He consulted to Mercedes-Benz, the Federal Reserve, GE, and The New York Times. His methodology, developed over decades and quietly taught in his books and workshops, has been called the most effective pricing framework for professional service providers that has never gone mainstream. Most founders have never encountered it.

Here is the problem: when you propose a project to a wealthy client, you write a proposal. The proposal lists deliverables, timelines, hourly rates, and justifications. You have just made three fatal mistakes. You have anchored the conversation to time, you have invited them to compare you to alternatives, and you have made yourself sound like an employee asking for a salary.

The Demand Letter flips this.

How it works: Instead of a proposal, you send a single page, never more, structured around three elements only: the business outcomes the client will achieve (not the tasks you will perform), the metrics that define success in their own language, and a flat project investment (never hourly) with three options at three price points.

The psychology at work: high income clients make decisions based on value, not cost. Presenting three options converts the question from "should I hire this person?" to "which version of working with this person do I want?" a decision that has already assumed yes. Weiss calls this columnar pricing and it increases close rates and average deal size simultaneously.

Why it should matter to you: you are likely undercharging and over explaining. The Demand Letter teaches you to do the opposite. State the outcome. Name the price. Let silence do the work.

The one line version: "Write what they get, not what you do. Price the result, not the effort." Heres a link to a substack that explains this vs buying the books to see if you like the approach first.

The smartest founders are often the slowest to find product market fit. Not because they lack ideas. Because they cannot stop building them. The smartest of you lot, will most likely wont be the richest, take this to heart. Read on.

There is a particular kind of founder failure that nobody talks about because it looks like hard work from the outside. The founder who architects the full system before validating the problem(even in their mind). The one who spends time arguing about perfecting the onboarding flow for a product nobody has asked for. The one who walks into an investor meeting with a beautifully designed deck, a detailed go-to-market plan, and zero customer conversations.

Call it what it is: Solutioning Disease.

It is not laziness. It is the opposite. It is intelligence without discipline, turned inward. The founder is not building for the customer. They are building to prove something to themselves.

Here is the hard truth. Elegance in execution means nothing if you are executing in the wrong direction. A perfectly engineered solution to a problem nobody has is just expensive theater.

The founders who win early are not the ones with the best ideas. They are the ones willing to feel stupid long enough to find out what is actually true. They ask before they build. They validate before they invest. They resist the urge to show how smart they are until someone has confirmed there is a reason to care.

Fit before features. Relevance before refinement. Every time.

In 2010, Paras Chopra quit his job in Delhi with one goal: make $1,000 in a month from something he built himself.

He made $4,000 in the first month. Then he just kept going.

The product was Visual Website Optimizer, a dead simple A/B testing tool that let non-technical marketers test changes to their websites without needing a developer. At the time, A/B testing was something only engineering teams at companies like Amazon and eBay could do. Paras decided that was absurd, and built a tool that put it in the hands of anyone with a browser.

He raised zero dollars. Hired no investors. Took no board meetings. He and his co-founder Sparsh Gupta just built, charged from day one, and grew slowly and quietly for fifteen years. By the time most people in the startup world had never heard of them, they had 6,000 clients across 90 countries, over $50 million in annual revenue, and were serving Microsoft, Walt Disney, and General Electric.

In January 2025, private equity firm Everstone acquired Wingify for $200 million. Paras owned 71 percent of the company. The remaining 29 percent before the acquisition was held by three parties his co-founder Sparsh Gupta had about 4.2 percent, a founding director named Anil Chopra (his father) held about 9.4 percent, and an employee stock option pool made up the remaining 15.2 percent allocated to the team over 15 years.He had never diluted a single point to a venture firm.

His announcement on X after the deal closed: "The biggest change in my life after the Wingify exit is that I have started taking Uber Premier instead of Uber Go."

That is the whole energy.

I want to acknowledge something first. A lot of you are carrying weight right now that has nothing to do with your business. The news is genuinely painful, the human cost of what is happening in the world is real, and it is okay to feel that. You do not need to perform optimism.

What I do want to offer, gently, is this.

The world has always asked builders to build during hard times. Not despite them, but right inside them. Some of the most quietly important things humans have ever made were built by people who were also grieving, also afraid, also watching the news and feeling helpless about what they could not control.

Building something is not an act of ignoring the world. It can be an act of refusing to let the worst of it have the last word.

You do not have to be okay right now to keep going. Those two things can exist at the same time.

Better Outcomes to all…

-Faizan…

P.S. Writing this newsletter takes time and commitment. Last week I included 3 ads only ones I believe are truly relevant.Quick ask: please click through and check them out. If you’re an e-commerce builder or using GPT/agents, I’d especially value your feedback.Think of it as a simple “thumbs up” after years of betting on outcomes that matter.Just 3 clicks. I’ll share results over the next month and eventually explain the test.

Last month, 48% of visitors to documentation sites across Mintlify were AI agents—not humans.

Claude Code, Cursor, and other coding agents are becoming the actual customers reading your docs. And they read everything.

This changes what good documentation means. Humans skim and forgive gaps. Agents methodically check every endpoint, read every guide, and compare you against alternatives with zero fatigue.

Your docs aren't just helping users anymore—they're your product's first interview with the machines deciding whether to recommend you.

That means:
→ Clear schema markup so agents can parse your content
→ Real benchmarks, not marketing fluff
→ Open endpoints agents can actually test
→ Honest comparisons that emphasize strengths without hype

In the agentic world, documentation becomes 10x more important. Companies that make their products machine-understandable will win distribution through AI.

Make Your Docs Agent-Ready